Friday, 12 August 2022

Trump And The New Watergate

Politically the other President that President Trump resembles the most is President Kennedy , they were both Classical Liberals. But to the broad Left he resembles President Nixon, a figure that they love to hate, just like President Trump.

On the 8th August 2022 the FBI raided President Trumps home in Florida and the question has been why?

Officially the answer has been that he took documents, including classified documents, from the White House when he left office. In the discussion's that have taken place since the raid it seems that the law isn't as clear as it should be, as every President since 1977, when the law was passed has had this exact same issue. Apart from President Trump no search warrants have been sort or given and no FBI raids have been conducted, so why is this different?

Because the broad Left want President Trump to have his Watergate moment. When President Nixon was forced to resign, which was humiliating and it was the end of his political career. He effectively vanished from the scene and it was years before he reappeared and years more before his reputation was repaired. President Trump however has not gone away and everything that they hate about him is still around. If he had a Watergate moment whereby he was forced to admit that he was wrong, then he would lose his reputation and be forced by public opinion to disappear from public sight. The raid seems to be part of that agenda, just as going after his supporters and those who worked for him has been. 

But why do they hate him so much?

- He used to be one of them and your not allowed to leave the cult

- He turned against President Obama

- He sided with the Republicans

- He was rich

- He was only allowed to be famous because he was entertaining and he got above his station

- He said things that are not allowed to be said in polite society anymore, things that they feel should be illegal to say

-  He demonstrated that there was a lot more resistance to their ideas than they ever imagined

- He became the figurehead of the resistance to their ideas

- He refused to understand that he wasn't in charge 

- He said that the people who cheated in the election, cheated

- He has refused to go away

- He continues to inspire people through his rallies

- He continues to say things that they believe should be illegal to say

- He keeps hinting that he will rerun for President

- Ironically they hate him because they can't stop thinking about him

If something is found and he can be charged with a criminal offence, even a minor one, then they can disqualify him from office and call him a crook. If you remember they tried this when he was President with their constant impeachment threats. Which means that this might be a fishing expedition where law enforcement 'fish' for evidence, maybe they get a 'bite' and maybe they don't but you won't find out if you don't go fishing. 

Many are now suggesting that this raid has been a foolish move, that it has energised President Trump and his base. However the raid was designed to reenergise the Lefts base, to get them excited that his days may be numbered and to remind them that he exists. Hilary Clinton is already using this to raise funds. I also wonder if this is designed to get him to run, either because they believe that by hook or by crook that they can beat him, or to force the oxygen out of other Republican candidates. 

 What is clear is that no other former President has been raided and that this highlights the way that the law and law enforcement has been corrupted. It also puts a spotlight on why people are losing their trust in government and in the institutions of government. Both of which can only lead to a dark and dangerous place.

To Help Support My Work

https://www.subscribestar.com/upon-hope


Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Future

Another Article You Might Like?

Ending Unemployment And Immigration

Thursday, 11 August 2022

The One Hundred And Thirteenth Month

Apart from low energy and sleeping longer, I no longer have Covid. I got my taste back and things are mostly back to normal. I have had a good month, although about half of that has been in the last week. I wish Blogger gave better information, all it tells me is that they are American, use Linux and that the website that they came from was 'other'...which is not very helpful.

Over the past month I have had 3,933 visitors, my worst day was the 20th July when I had 16 visitors and my best was the 6th August when I had 602 visitors. 


United States
2.73K
Australia
804
Russia
40
United Kingdom
31
Netherlands
28
Hungary
25
Sweden
21
Mexico
20
Canada
19
New Zealand
18
Germany
14
France
13
Bulgaria
7
Singapore
7
Vietnam
6
Indonesia
5
Thailand
5
Ireland
4
India
4
Other
204




Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Future

Another Article You Might Like

The One Hundred And First Month

Wednesday, 3 August 2022

Women And The Army - The Slippery Slope

I wanted a way to highlight the problem of the Slippery Slope, the process by which things move in only one direction. How each thing builds upon the next thing and leads further and further until we are left wondering how did things get this bad. 

In Western armies women did not serve in any official capacity until the 1850's. Women were however present with nearly every army, they were a good portion of what were called 'camp followers'. Camp followers were all those people who followed the army camp and included wife's and children of the soldiers, girlfriends, prostitutes and all manner of men and women who thought that they could make money off of either the army or the soldiers. While they did not wear uniforms, were not paid by the army, did not fight and were rarely subject to military discipline. Women performed valuable service for the army, they took care of the sick and wounded, they found supplies for the army and they cooked. laundered and cleaned. 

During the 1800's that began to change as armies decided that they needed their own permanent supply systems, complete with all of the facilities that it would require in war. Women were no longer allowed to follow the armies. But at the same time that this was happening another thing was allowing women into the army. Before the 1850's most armies medical care was very rudimentary. Each regiment had it's own doctor and he had some staff and that was about it. During the Crimean War, the British army decided to sent female nurses to treat the wounded. This was not a popular decision as female nurses had a very bad reputation, one women was to change that, Florence Nightingale. Her efforts helped save many of the sick and wounded British soldiers during the war. 

The American Civil War saw more female nurses serve and while women were kept as far from the fighting as possible it now became accepted that women had a small place within armies. In WWI women's role's increased as the armies grew to an enormous size. The demand for manpower grew and grew, men were needed in the armed forces, in industry and in agriculture. The demand was so great that women were sort to fill any role that they could do so that a man would become available for military service. By 1917 that included Auxiliary military units, who wore uniforms, were paid by the government and were subject to military discipline, but they were not strictly part of the armed forces. They carried out roles far from the front and many were in what were regarded as women's jobs, such as Telephonists. Although they also did jobs that were regarded as men's work but which women could physically do, like clerking and other office based jobs. Just to give an example of how these positions were regarded, women who joined the US military were not regarded as soldiers, were not given medals and did not get pension rights until 1977.  At the end of the war all of these units were disbanded as a war time necessary. But it was a further move on the slippery slope.

Even before WWII began new women's services were created, like before they were to take over jobs so that men could be made available, not just for military service, but for combat. Because unlike in WWI the roles that women performed was greatly expanded, they were still to be kept away from combat, but now they did many technical tasks, mechanic, drivers, flying aircraft between North America and Britain, within Britain flying newly built aircraft from the factories to military airfields. Each country had it's own way of doing things.

In Germany women services were created, even though women were supposed to be wives and mothers only.

In Britain women served in mixed sex Anti-Aircraft batteries in semi-combat roles, men operated the guns, but women did the range finding and other tasks within the unit. In 1943 as the manpower shortage bit deep, women were conscripted for the first time in history. Unmarried women without children were liable for call up. Unlike men, women who were called up had a choice, they could serve in the Women's Land Army, in approved industrial jobs or in the women's services. Of those who served in the women's services very few served outside of Britain and while they were subject to military discipline, they were not treated as harshly as men were. If a women decide that she had had enough and wanted to go home, officially she was not allowed to, unofficially if she left they simply discharged her. If a man tried that it he would find himself in the infamous 'Glasshouse', the British armies military prison. 

The most interesting of women's service was in the Soviet army. At the start of the war there were no women in the Soviet army. But women lobbied to serve just as they had in other countries during WWII. The Soviets had plans to create over 50 Brigades of women, that's roughly 150,000 women but in the end they didn't even create one. They did however create 3 air regiments that were all female and they were combat units. Two were equipped with very modern aircraft, the third was given obsolete biplanes. These aircraft flew at night as they would have been destroyed if they had flown during the day. They would turn off their engines  and glide so that they could attack ground targets by surprise and then turn them back on after they had dropped their bombs. The Germans called them the Night Witches as it sounded like a witches cackle when they turned their engines back on. 

Most women served as first aiders, clerks and signal personnel and it was common for women to serve in otherwise all male units as specialists. Although the most famous Soviet soldiers were snipers, the number of these women was small, a few hundred. They received a great deal of attention both during and after the war, but it is interesting that as the war went on there is less and less information about them. 

The other combat task that women did was in the last year or so of the war to serve as drivers of the T-34 tanks. The drivers compartment was tiny and short men were the only ones who could serve in that role. But as the war went on there were less and less of these men, so women were called upon to fill that role. Again it is interesting that it is such a very specific role, women, at least officially, did not service in other tanks or in other roles within the T-34. At the end of the war women were discharged from the Soviet army and except for medical roles women did not serve during the Cold War.

I would like to tell you two small stories from Australia. In 1944 Australia's Prime Minister had a meeting with an Australian General, after the meeting he walked the General to his car. The driver got out of the car and opened the door for the General, the Prime Minister was shocked and exclaimed 'But she's a women!' Traditionally men open doors for women, women don't open doors for men. The General replied 'No Prime Minister she's a soldier!' 

In 1945 just after the war in the Pacific had ended the head of the Australian Army Nursing Service decided that she would fly and meet the Australian nurses who had been prisoners of the Japanese. She was shocked at how badly the POW nurses looked after their captivity. However they were also shocked at the appearance of the head nurse, she was wearing pants. Before the war respectable women didn't wear pants, men wore pants and women wore skirts or dresses. More motion on that slippery slope.

Unlike the Soviets, the Wests military leaders really liked the women services. Women who volunteered for military serve were generally highly educated, intelligent with low levels of ill discipline. They were generally middle class, where as most military personal were working class. Here was a segment of the population that served in wartime but not in peacetime and if they were female instead of male that had it's problems but it also had it's advantages. The military pushed hard to retain the women's services and they won. Women continued to serve during the Cold War. During WWII the vast majority of women did not serve outside of their own country. But after the war that changed, women now served overseas just as male personnel did. Another move on the slippery slope.

At many memorial services today you will often heard something along the lines of 'our men and women' who served or died and it gives off a very wrong impression. Now I do not want to give the impression that a women dying in war is not worth remembrance, it is, but the numbers should also be kept in perspective. 

In Vietnam around 2,500,000 Americans served and 58,000 died, of those 11,000 who served were women and 8 of them died, nearly 90% of the women served as nurses. A further 61 American women, all civilians, died in Vietnam, 38 of them in a plane crash in 1975 during Operation Babylift

520 Australians died in the Vietnam War, 1 of them was female, she was diagnosed with leukaemia while serving as a nurse in Vietnam, she died in Sydney, Australia. I should say that if she had been a man his name would also be included. I only want to put this into perspective.

But just as things were happening in Vietnam things were happening outside of Vietnam. In this case Feminism, which said that anything a man can do women should be able to do as well. So from the 1970's there grew a push for the roles that women did within the military to be expanded and for the end of the women's services. Today there are no women's services, they have all been disbanded and women reassigned to army units. At that time they were still forbidden from serving in combat, although in most countries women are now allowed to serve in combat units. But rarely do.

In Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait and Syria between 2001- 2021 152 American women died. below are those who died in 2009.

Afghanistan

  1. Sgt. Simone Robinson, 21, IED attack in Kabul on Feb. 28, single mother of two year-old daughter, Mar. 1, 2009.
  2. Navy Lt. Florence B. Choe, 35, killed by Afghan soldier while running at Camp Shaheen, Mazar-e-Sharif, 3 year-old daughter, March 27, 2009.
  3. Air Force Lt. Roslyn L. Schulte, 25, IED hit on vehicle near Kabul, May 20, 2009.
  4. Air Force Senior Airman Ashton L.M. Goodman, 21, IED hit on vehicle near Bagram AFB, May 26, 2009.
  5. Staff Sgt. Tara J. Smith, 33, non-combat related incident under investigation, mother of two boys, 8 and 6, August 4, 2009.
  6. Sgt. Eduviges G. Wolf, 24, RPG attack on vehicle, wife and mother of two girls, ages 3 and 1, October 22, 2009.

    Iraq

  1. Spc. Jessica Y. Sarandrea, 22, mortar fire on forward operating base near Mosul, Mar. 3, 2009
  2. Staff Sgt. Army C. Tirador, 29, non-combat incident near Kirkush, Nov. 4, 2009.
Kuwait
  1. Pfc. Cwislyn K. Walter, 19, non-combat related, near Kuwait City, Feb. 19, 2009.
Mother of two year old daughter, 3 year old daughter, mother of two boys, 8 and 6, wife and mother of two girls, ages 3 and 1. These were not women killed in attacks on their homeland, these were women who were deployed into harms way. 

This is were the slippery slope has taken us and we are not off the slippery slope. The slope is still here and it is still slippery and it will lead us on to further horrors. Horrors which our rulers call progress.


To Help Support My Work


Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Future
Another Article You Might Like?


Sunday, 31 July 2022

Constant Crisis

I have written about this before, about how our society has become addicted to crisis. Particularly the over educated parts of our society. We have a 'Climate Crisis', we have not one but two medical emergencies, Covid-19 and Monkey Pox, we have wars and rumours of war and we have recession and supply chain problems and shortages. Now some of these are real, others not so much, however even the real ones are exaggerated.  

How did we get to a stage whereby we live in constant crisis?

What benefit do people get from this constant crisis?

Lets look at the first question, For over 40 years we lived in the Cold War, a period where fear of the outbreak of war was constant. Armies stood ready to fight and if war had broken out few would have been surprised. Most of the time things were normal, with nothing really happening and then without warning a major crisis would appear. But it was always in the background, shaping peoples opinions as well the operations of institutions. Many got used to it, in fact it came to seem as if the constant threat of war was normal, the way the world had always been. 

This way of thinking moved away from the military and government and came to be viewed as normal in other areas. Maybe the first time this became evident was in the AIDS crisis of the mid-1980's. At first it was unclear how this new disease worked, but by 1984 it was clear that it was a blood disease and that the transfer of blood between people was the only way of transmitting the disease. But instead it was strongly stated that this was a sexually transmitted disease and that the primary way of transmitting the disease was through sex. Normal sex between heterosexuals does not involve the transfer of blood. Which means that they lied and they knew that they were lying.

Although maybe the first time was the New Ice Age scare of the 1970's?

Which lead on to the hole in the ozone layer which lead to Global Warming, now know as Climate Change. The idea that man can change the climate by accident and that man should be able to change the climate back to some optimal setting. But of course the climate is always changing. it has never been static as the Climate Change lobby likes to imply. 

Of course we have seen the rise of the medical crisis, the idea that every new disease can kill us, in fact it has the potential to kill us all. The medical profession has decided that it likes crisis.

In every one of these we see the hand of the over educated, they need purpose in their life. They need to feel that they are making a difference, that their lives matter. Because the crisis is one of the major things that excites them, but it also is a class indicator. The over educated need a way to show that they are special, that they are moral, that they care and that they are in control of the world. They control disease, they control war and peace, they control the economy, they control how society is changing and they control the weather. 

They need to be in control and the constant crisis gives them the illusion that they are in control.


 To Help Support My Work

https://www.subscribestar.com/upon-hope


Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Future

Another Article You Might Like?

Liberalism Fights Back

Friday, 22 July 2022

Abolishing Women

Over at Adventures in Keeping House there is this article Hello Fellow Menstruaters, where by Sanne has this to say: 

It's been quite some time since I started noticing that American health websites when dealing with topics such as pregnancy or cycles or anything female-related are purposefully avoiding to use the word woman.

 For instance, it's a "pregnant person" or "persons who menstruate" or even "persons capable of pregnancy" but menstruator just takes the cake!

This idea that women don't exist has actually been around for a long time. Recently it has gotten a big boost with the Trans ideology. But it certainly didn't start there and if allowed to progress it won't finish there. 

All Traditional societies have exactly the same view, men and women exist, no other sex exists and men and women are both vital components in society existing. in the past, in the present and in the future. That was our societies view up until the past fifty years or so. So what happened?

Liberalism happened, helped along by it's handmaidens Feminism and the Trans Ideology. Liberalism is a lot older than 50 years old, but it is the base upon which the abolishing of women stands. It believes that society was created by individuals, that each person created society by their individual decisions. Traditionally the view has been that society was created by families bonding together to form larger political groupings. Liberalism rejects that view and instead the individual creates society, but society also restricts the individual. It puts in place rules, artificial rules, that stop the growth of the individual. So the creator of society is also oppressed by society, the thing that it created. Which means that for people to be free, then these artificial rules themselves need to be abolished.

Once people are freed from these rules than the Autonomous Individual can arise. a self made person unrestrained by the artificial rules that society once imposed. This Autonomous Individual can change anything about themselves that they like, including their sex. Now if your thinking that that is insane, then your right, but it is the ultimate objective of Liberalism. The Autonomous Individual unstrained by artificial rules.

This idea has been around for at least two centuries, so it's not a new idea. But most Liberals and their fellow travellers don't think about the end goal, most don't even understand that there is an end goal. But they do follow the logic of Liberalism and they do make sure that they are on the fashionable side of politics. 

Feminism has three main trains of thought

1. Men and women are equal and interchangeable

2. Men are defective and women are superior

3. Men and women don't really exist, only people exist

Feminism is not it's own philosophy, it is simply Liberalism applied to the lives of women. Feminism has always tried to push the idea that women are no different to men and at the same time argue that men oppress women. Just as society oppresses the individual. You might have noticed that 1 and 3 share a great deal in common, because 1 leads to 3. The differences between men and women are at first downplayed and over time denied. We see this denial all around us. Many young people believe that women are just as strong as a man, even though common sense and your own eyes will tell you otherwise. But of course we are constantly told to ignore our own experiences and instead to believe what we are told. 

Feminism has gone out of it's way to deny that women exist. They insist that there should be no notice taken in recruitment, in education, they have even insisted that women should all be addressed as Ms. Many people will tell you that it's about fairness, but where do these ideas lead?

They lead to the idea that women don't really exist, only non-descript people exist. 

Which leads to gender, people do not have genders, people are biological creatures which mean that we have sexes, either a male sex or a female sex. Gender is not a new fashioned word for sex, it is a completely new word for a completely new concept. That concept is that people can choose to be whoever they want to be, Autonomous Individuals. Sex does not change, it is immutable, unchanging. But as gender is a social construct then it can be changed. That is the difference between sex and gender and while we have it pushed down our thoughts it is simply another lie.

Which leads on to the Trans Ideology. Trans is the next step in Liberalisms war against us and reality. If the Autonomous Individual is to come into being then every other type of person has to be abolished. Only the Autonomous Individual can live in the future because they are the only type of person who has shown their complete and total loyalty. Trans further pushes the line, asking the question what is a women?

Do women really exist?

Why are they asking this question instead of do men exist?

Because men might get violent, but women are unlikely to get violent. However while it is womens turn today you can be certain that in the future men will also have this lie pushed onto them. The idea is to reduce us all into Autonomous Individuals. To remake society into what they want, not into what we want because they believe that once we live in a world of Autonomous Individuals then we will have achieved perfection. A world without war, hate or discrimination.

But of course if this is allowed to continue we will not live in that world. Instead we will live in a Transhuman world, whereby people will be created by artificial means. Artificial sperm inserted into articial wombs. They will be bred without any parent but the government who they will be dependant upon their entire life. 

Men and women are life, they are both vital to the continuance of human existence, Liberalism is not. For the human race to continue to exist Liberalism must not exist.


To Help Support My Work

https://www.subscribestar.com/upon-hope


Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Society

Another Article You Might Like?

Some Link Love III

  

 

Tuesday, 12 July 2022

The One Hundred And Twelfth Month

I've got Covid!

It started last Thursday afternoon, I started to loose energy and then got a headache. I decided that I needed food and some air and then I would feel better. I bought some food got home and was like I'm not eating that. I gave it away and went to bed, that was about 6:30pm. I then slept and awoke randomly for the next three days. Two panadols were the only thing I "ate" for those three days, although I drank even more liquid than normal. The only time I spend out of bed was going to the toilet and refilling my drink. 

Then on Sunday I started to feel better, not quite so tired, but as the day wore on I started to noticed that my mouth felt strange. I was losing my sense of taste, so that is the new challenge as it seems that losing your taste is a lot like when you have something very hot and you burn the inside of your mouth. Nothing tastes as it should. Today it took me two hours to eat breakfast, as it was such a task. However I have read that maybe smaller but more frequent meals are the way to go. I think I will give that a try. Although I also have a sore throat which complicates the issue.

My nephew had a Rapid Antigen Test, which I took and which confirmed that I had Covid. Although I tell you the test was worse then the three days in bed sick! 

I currently have low levels of energy, but today I haven't had to lie down once so that is improving. Which is why I'm publishing this a day late. I was up yesterday and I was ready to write but I put it off and then I got super tired and went to bed early. 

This month I have had 3,800 visitors, my best day was the 8th of July, when I had 666 visitors, my worst day was the 4th July when I had 22.

 United States                                                                                                                   3.85K

Australia
702
Russia
180
Canada
108
Japan
83
Portugal
41
Germany
29
United Kingdom
27
Turkey
20
France
18
Ireland
12
Netherlands
11
New Zealand
9
Belgium
7
South Korea
5
India
4
Philippines
4
Peru
3
Sweden
3
Other
96

Thursday, 7 July 2022

Abortion And The Failure Of Democracy

The ending of Roe vs Wade in the United States has brought abortion to the forefront of peoples minds. Despite the rhetoric abortion has not been banned, instead it has merely had the level of government responsible for it change back to what it was before 1973. Instead of the Federal government being responsible, now state governments will be responsible for such matters. 

But as I thought over the issue it really showed how Democracy is used and abused, how it claims to solve problems but in the case of abortion it instead kept it alive. Most people don't want to think about abortion, instead what they want is to be told the correct opinion that they should have. The people who actively support abortion is small, as is the number who actively oppose it. By active I mean people who are prepared to protest, organise or donate time or money. 

If Democracy ran the way we are told that it runs then it would be a non-issue to most people and the law would be quite similar in most places. Because when asked people give very similar answers, in the first trimester (the first three months) they support abortion. It is still the custom not to tell people that a women is pregnant until the third month as so much can go wrong in a pregnancy at that stage. Within the second trimester (the middle three months of a pregnancy) abortion becomes controversial because there is disagreement on when the cut off date should be. In the third trimester (the last three months) most people are opposed to abortion. Or to put it another way most people move from a pro-choice position to a pro-life position during the course of a pregnancy.

That extends to related issues such as rape, incest, the baby being mentally or physically deformed and the health of the mother. In all of these cases the majority are pro-choice. However when it comes to sex selection or any other 'choice' issues, such as eye colour or things of that nature, the majority opinion is that you should not be able to choose such things. In these matters the majority are pro-life. 

So if there is a consensus position why are these things controversial?

Because one of Liberalisms great objectives is to take away consequences, particularly when it comes to sex. The idea is that life should be about making choices and that none of those should be bad choices. Every choice leads to a different door in life but none of these should lead to sadness or consequences. It is the same logic that supports casual sex and divorce. 

Now you might be saying but that's not possible, well your right, but that is what they want, the impossible. So they stake out an extreme position and insist that it is reasonable. That it is about supporting women, about supporting choice and that these things are the only moral position to have. But it is of course no such thing. They have highjacked this issue and instead of looking for a compromise they instead insist that only their extreme position is allowed. 

Just like they do with every issue!


To Help Support My Work

https://www.subscribestar.com/upon-hope


Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Future

Another Article You Might Like?

Learn To Get Along - Or Else!