Constant Crisis

I have written about this before, about how our society has become addicted to crisis. Particularly the over educated parts of our society. We have a 'Climate Crisis', we have not one but two medical emergencies, Covid-19 and Monkey Pox, we have wars and rumours of war and we have recession and supply chain problems and shortages. Now some of these are real, others not so much, however even the real ones are exaggerated.  

How did we get to a stage whereby we live in constant crisis?

What benefit do people get from this constant crisis?

Lets look at the first question, For over 40 years we lived in the Cold War, a period where fear of the outbreak of war was constant. Armies stood ready to fight and if war had broken out few would have been surprised. Most of the time things were normal, with nothing really happening and then without warning a major crisis would appear. But it was always in the background, shaping peoples opinions as well the operations of institutions. Many got used to it, in fact it came to seem as if the constant threat of war was normal, the way the world had always been. 

This way of thinking moved away from the military and government and came to be viewed as normal in other areas. Maybe the first time this became evident was in the AIDS crisis of the mid-1980's. At first it was unclear how this new disease worked, but by 1984 it was clear that it was a blood disease and that the transfer of blood between people was the only way of transmitting the disease. But instead it was strongly stated that this was a sexually transmitted disease and that the primary way of transmitting the disease was through sex. Normal sex between heterosexuals does not involve the transfer of blood. Which means that they lied and they knew that they were lying.

Although maybe the first time was the New Ice Age scare of the 1970's?

Which lead on to the hole in the ozone layer which lead to Global Warming, now know as Climate Change. The idea that man can change the climate by accident and that man should be able to change the climate back to some optimal setting. But of course the climate is always changing. it has never been static as the Climate Change lobby likes to imply. 

Of course we have seen the rise of the medical crisis, the idea that every new disease can kill us, in fact it has the potential to kill us all. The medical profession has decided that it likes crisis.

In every one of these we see the hand of the over educated, they need purpose in their life. They need to feel that they are making a difference, that their lives matter. Because the crisis is one of the major things that excites them, but it also is a class indicator. The over educated need a way to show that they are special, that they are moral, that they care and that they are in control of the world. They control disease, they control war and peace, they control the economy, they control how society is changing and they control the weather. 

They need to be in control and the constant crisis gives them the illusion that they are in control.

 To Help Support My Work

https://www.subscribestar.com/upon-hope

Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Future

Another Article You Might Like?

Liberalism Fights Back

Abolishing Women

Over at Adventures in Keeping House there is this article Hello Fellow Menstruaters, where by Sanne has this to say: 

It's been quite some time since I started noticing that American health websites when dealing with topics such as pregnancy or cycles or anything female-related are purposefully avoiding to use the word woman.

 For instance, it's a "pregnant person" or "persons who menstruate" or even "persons capable of pregnancy" but menstruator just takes the cake!

This idea that women don't exist has actually been around for a long time. Recently it has gotten a big boost with the Trans ideology. But it certainly didn't start there and if allowed to progress it won't finish there. 

All Traditional societies have exactly the same view, men and women exist, no other sex exists and men and women are both vital components in society existing. in the past, in the present and in the future. That was our societies view up until the past fifty years or so. So what happened?

Liberalism happened, helped along by it's handmaidens Feminism and the Trans Ideology. Liberalism is a lot older than 50 years old, but it is the base upon which the abolishing of women stands. It believes that society was created by individuals, that each person created society by their individual decisions. Traditionally the view has been that society was created by families bonding together to form larger political groupings. Liberalism rejects that view and instead the individual creates society, but society also restricts the individual. It puts in place rules, artificial rules, that stop the growth of the individual. So the creator of society is also oppressed by society, the thing that it created. Which means that for people to be free, then these artificial rules themselves need to be abolished.

Once people are freed from these rules than the Autonomous Individual can arise. a self made person unrestrained by the artificial rules that society once imposed. This Autonomous Individual can change anything about themselves that they like, including their sex. Now if your thinking that that is insane, then your right, but it is the ultimate objective of Liberalism. The Autonomous Individual unstrained by artificial rules.

This idea has been around for at least two centuries, so it's not a new idea. But most Liberals and their fellow travellers don't think about the end goal, most don't even understand that there is an end goal. But they do follow the logic of Liberalism and they do make sure that they are on the fashionable side of politics. 

Feminism has three main trains of thought

1. Men and women are equal and interchangeable

2. Men are defective and women are superior

3. Men and women don't really exist, only people exist

Feminism is not it's own philosophy, it is simply Liberalism applied to the lives of women. Feminism has always tried to push the idea that women are no different to men and at the same time argue that men oppress women. Just as society oppresses the individual. You might have noticed that 1 and 3 share a great deal in common, because 1 leads to 3. The differences between men and women are at first downplayed and over time denied. We see this denial all around us. Many young people believe that women are just as strong as a man, even though common sense and your own eyes will tell you otherwise. But of course we are constantly told to ignore our own experiences and instead to believe what we are told. 

Feminism has gone out of it's way to deny that women exist. They insist that there should be no notice taken in recruitment, in education, they have even insisted that women should all be addressed as Ms. Many people will tell you that it's about fairness, but where do these ideas lead?

They lead to the idea that women don't really exist, only non-descript people exist. 

Which leads to gender, people do not have genders, people are biological creatures which mean that we have sexes, either a male sex or a female sex. Gender is not a new fashioned word for sex, it is a completely new word for a completely new concept. That concept is that people can choose to be whoever they want to be, Autonomous Individuals. Sex does not change, it is immutable, unchanging. But as gender is a social construct then it can be changed. That is the difference between sex and gender and while we have it pushed down our thoughts it is simply another lie.

Which leads on to the Trans Ideology. Trans is the next step in Liberalisms war against us and reality. If the Autonomous Individual is to come into being then every other type of person has to be abolished. Only the Autonomous Individual can live in the future because they are the only type of person who has shown their complete and total loyalty. Trans further pushes the line, asking the question what is a women?

Do women really exist?

Why are they asking this question instead of do men exist?

Because men might get violent, but women are unlikely to get violent. However while it is womens turn today you can be certain that in the future men will also have this lie pushed onto them. The idea is to reduce us all into Autonomous Individuals. To remake society into what they want, not into what we want because they believe that once we live in a world of Autonomous Individuals then we will have achieved perfection. A world without war, hate or discrimination.

But of course if this is allowed to continue we will not live in that world. Instead we will live in a Transhuman world, whereby people will be created by artificial means. Artificial sperm inserted into articial wombs. They will be bred without any parent but the government who they will be dependant upon their entire life. 

Men and women are life, they are both vital to the continuance of human existence, Liberalism is not. For the human race to continue to exist Liberalism must not exist.

To Help Support My Work

https://www.subscribestar.com/upon-hope

Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Society

Another Article You Might Like?

Some Link Love III

  

 

The One Hundred And Twelfth Month

I've got Covid!

It started last Thursday afternoon, I started to loose energy and then got a headache. I decided that I needed food and some air and then I would feel better. I bought some food got home and was like I'm not eating that. I gave it away and went to bed, that was about 6:30pm. I then slept and awoke randomly for the next three days. Two panadols were the only thing I "ate" for those three days, although I drank even more liquid than normal. The only time I spend out of bed was going to the toilet and refilling my drink. 

Then on Sunday I started to feel better, not quite so tired, but as the day wore on I started to noticed that my mouth felt strange. I was losing my sense of taste, so that is the new challenge as it seems that losing your taste is a lot like when you have something very hot and you burn the inside of your mouth. Nothing tastes as it should. Today it took me two hours to eat breakfast, as it was such a task. However I have read that maybe smaller but more frequent meals are the way to go. I think I will give that a try. Although I also have a sore throat which complicates the issue.

My nephew had a Rapid Antigen Test, which I took and which confirmed that I had Covid. Although I tell you the test was worse then the three days in bed sick! 

I currently have low levels of energy, but today I haven't had to lie down once so that is improving. Which is why I'm publishing this a day late. I was up yesterday and I was ready to write but I put it off and then I got super tired and went to bed early. 

This month I have had 3,800 visitors, my best day was the 8th of July, when I had 666 visitors, my worst day was the 4th July when I had 22.

 United States                                                                                                                   3.85K

Australia

702

Russia

180

Canada

108

Japan

83

Portugal

41

Germany

29

United Kingdom

27

Turkey

20

France

18

Ireland

12

Netherlands

11

New Zealand

9

Belgium

7

South Korea

5

India

4

Philippines

4

Peru

3

Sweden

3

Other

96

Abortion And The Failure Of Democracy

The ending of Roe vs Wade in the United States has brought abortion to the forefront of peoples minds. Despite the rhetoric abortion has not been banned, instead it has merely had the level of government responsible for it change back to what it was before 1973. Instead of the Federal government being responsible, now state governments will be responsible for such matters. 

But as I thought over the issue it really showed how Democracy is used and abused, how it claims to solve problems but in the case of abortion it instead kept it alive. Most people don't want to think about abortion, instead what they want is to be told the correct opinion that they should have. The people who actively support abortion is small, as is the number who actively oppose it. By active I mean people who are prepared to protest, organise or donate time or money. 

If Democracy ran the way we are told that it runs then it would be a non-issue to most people and the law would be quite similar in most places. Because when asked people give very similar answers, in the first trimester (the first three months) they support abortion. It is still the custom not to tell people that a women is pregnant until the third month as so much can go wrong in a pregnancy at that stage. Within the second trimester (the middle three months of a pregnancy) abortion becomes controversial because there is disagreement on when the cut off date should be. In the third trimester (the last three months) most people are opposed to abortion. Or to put it another way most people move from a pro-choice position to a pro-life position during the course of a pregnancy.

That extends to related issues such as rape, incest, the baby being mentally or physically deformed and the health of the mother. In all of these cases the majority are pro-choice. However when it comes to sex selection or any other 'choice' issues, such as eye colour or things of that nature, the majority opinion is that you should not be able to choose such things. In these matters the majority are pro-life. 

So if there is a consensus position why are these things controversial?

Because one of Liberalisms great objectives is to take away consequences, particularly when it comes to sex. The idea is that life should be about making choices and that none of those should be bad choices. Every choice leads to a different door in life but none of these should lead to sadness or consequences. It is the same logic that supports casual sex and divorce. 

Now you might be saying but that's not possible, well your right, but that is what they want, the impossible. So they stake out an extreme position and insist that it is reasonable. That it is about supporting women, about supporting choice and that these things are the only moral position to have. But it is of course no such thing. They have highjacked this issue and instead of looking for a compromise they instead insist that only their extreme position is allowed. 

Just like they do with every issue!

To Help Support My Work

https://www.subscribestar.com/upon-hope

Upon Hope - A Traditionalist Future

Another Article You Might Like?

Learn To Get Along - Or Else!