Friday, 7 December 2018

Whats Your Intersectionality Score?

Are you telling me you don't know your Intersectionality score?

What are you sane!

So what is intersectionality?

"the theory that the overlap of various social identities, such as race, gender, and sexuality, contibutes to the systemic oppression and discrimination experienced by an individual"

In other words Leftest crap.

I scored 9 and I am more privileged than 86% of you suckers!

I played around with it and the best score I could come up with was 97, in which case 89% of people were more privileged. Although to get there I had to become a trans-women of colour who was disabled and a devout Muslim!

If I kept everything the same but changed my religion from Muslim to Jewish I got a score of 92, but still 88% of people were more privileged.

I know what your thinking, what about if my disabled trans-women of colour was a devout Christian, 85 with 86% of people being more privileged.

If you would like to find out your own interesctionality score go here,  https://intersectionalityscore.com/ , great entertainment for 10 minutes or so.


Upon Hope Blog - A Traditional Conservative Future
Another Article You Might Like?
Libertarianism, Why We Are Not Libertarians 

Wednesday, 5 December 2018

The Immigration Pos Never Ends

This week SBS, the Special Broadcasting Service put out an article on Immigration which says that 82% of Australians support Immigration!

Now thats a big number and it doesn't quite ring true of my experience as an Australian who lives in Australia. So lets have a look at this: 82 per cent of Australians support immigration despite population concerns

"A report by the Scanlon Foundation found more than four in five Australians see benefits to immigration, but concerns remain around overcrowding and house prices."

"The survey, which canvassed the views of 1,500 randomly chosen Australians, also found 52 per cent of Australians consider the current intake of migrants either 'about right' or 'too low'   

"But 43 per cent took the view that the view that the migrant intake was 'too high', up from 37 per cent last year. The finding is the highest since 2010 when it peaked at 47 per cent"    

82% in the headline, but 52% further on think it's about right or too low....how exactly do you reconcile these two numbers?

How do you reconcile that 43% think that immigration is too high with 82% support for immigration?

In the article there is also a survey that is current,

SBS News poll

Do you think Australia's current intake of migrants is:

Too low
28%

About right
21%

Too high
51%

Even an SBS poll shows 51% think immigration is too high....SBS who's charter it is to support Multiculturalism!

As I went through the article I thought, I recognise the author of this report, I've seen him supporting this type of thing before. The article calls him a researcher from Monash University, which is a bit of a let down in reality he is Professor Andrew Markus, Head of the Australian Centre for Jewish Civilization.

"Professor Markus has served on a number of panels, delivered numerous public presenations and keynote addresses. These included...."

The Research Institute on Social Cohesion
The Inclusive Brisbane Board
Parliament of Australia Senate Select Committee on Strengthening Multiculturalism
Settlement Service International
Cultural Shift from Settlement to Belonging
Deakin University’s inaugural conference ‘Cultural Diversity and News in Australia’
Australian Human Rights Commission’s ‘National Forum on Racial Tolerance and Community Harmony 2017’
Executive Council of Australian Jewry’s annual conference
Victoria University’s Colloquium ‘Far-Right Narratives, Movements and Networks’. 

Amongst others.

Lets be honest the man is a stereotype and no one forced him to be so, instead he chose to be one.

But there is another thing here, at the start of the article it mentions a group called the Scanlon Foundation, who are they?

Turns out the Scanlon Foundation was founded in 2009 by Peter Scanlon who is worth about $600,000,000 Australian dollars and he just loves immigration. The website is quite clear on what it's about. "The Scanlon Foundation aspires to see Australia advance as a welcoming, prosperous and cohesive nation particularly related to the transition of migrants into Australian Society."     

This article, Scanlon backs population growth is from 2009.

"It also happens that Mr. Scanlon has extensive property development interests, which clearly benefit from immigration-fuelled high population growth. 

Turns out Peter Scanlon is also a stereotype, a Right Liberal who just cannot see any downside to immigration and big money. One of those business types who think that every silver cloud has a silver lining. A good old fashioned Liberal who believes that borders stop people from making money and that no damn barrier should exist between the movement of money and people. We don't have a country anymore we have something better, a economy!

The Right Liberal stereotype finances a study that proves we just love the same thing that he loves. The Jewish Academic stereotype write's it all up and presents it for public consumption and the public broadcaster who takes our money but which has never been on our side presents it all as fact.

When it comes to Immigration the pos never ends.

Upon Hope Blog - A Traditional Conservative Future
Another Article You Might Like?
The End of any Consensus







Friday, 23 November 2018

Who Would You Vote For?

Today I voted, a day early, in the Victorian state election. I've complained before about how far left my electorate is, so I have brought home my how to vote cards that are given out before you enter the polling booth. And I'm going to ask you, how would you vote?

1. Liberal
2. Independent
3. Labor
4. Victorian Socialists
5. Greens
6. Animal Justice Party
7. Reason

Thats the order that they are presented on the ballot paper. Maybe you'd like some background, so here it is.

The Liberals - Pretend Conservatives, love business and destroying Melbourne's heritage, however in my electorate they have no change of winning.

Independent - A former local mayor, sometimes Labor member but not at the moment it seems as Labor have put him second last. A very mixed bag.

Labor - Current member and the current Government. Bad on crime, just terrible.

Victorian Socialists - Socialists, in a way an inspiration as it shows what can be done. They are the real deal, full on Socialists.

Greens - Watermelons, green on the outside, but red on the inside. They talk a good game, they even have individual policies that I support, but thats just the icing the rest of the cake is horrible.

Animal Justice Party - Again it's not that they are wrong, some of their ideas are good. However when a political party represents animals instead of people you really have to worry.

Reason - Secular Liberalism, they use weasel words, like drug reform instead of drug legalisation.

That is the lower house, in the upper house there were 52 candidates....I won't force you to go through that!

So in all honesty who would you vote for?

Upon Hope Blog - A Traditional Conservative Future
Another Article You Might Like?
How Do Dictators Stay In Power?

Wednesday, 21 November 2018

Melbourne Traditionalists in December, 2018

After a very successful Conference we are meeting up for another meeting this December. If your a man in Melbourne, Australia who is worried about where things are going then why not get in touch with me.

uponhopeblog (at) gmail.com

The Guiding Principles of the Melbourne Traditionalists

1. Loyalty to the Crown of Australia

2. Loyalty to our British and Western heritage

3. Loyalty to the family, Husband and Wife, Mother and Father and their children

4. Opposition to Liberalism, Right Liberalism, Left Liberalism and Feminism

5. Opposition to the destruction of White Australians, opposed to Multiculturalism, Mass Immigration and Diversity

Upon Hope Blog - A Traditional Conservative Future
Another Article You Might Like?
Is There a Path For Men Anymore?

Sunday, 18 November 2018

Is It Our Time?

I had a thought the other day, I was thinking about how our Civilization loves the new. In fact in a conflict between good and new, the new is preferred. Only rarely does good win, but a win is a win. However, the new is always a threat.

Then I thought about how Liberalism has used this love of the new for centuries to their advantage. It always portrayed itself as representing the new over the old. And for most of that time there was an element of truth, often an overwhelming element. Liberalism did represent change. They have changed so much. It can be overwhelming, depressing, maddening. The worst thing is that that will not stop, they are relentless in their hatred of everything they don't like.

So where does that leave us?

It leaves us with the task of repairing the damage that they have done. We are all time travellers moving into the future at one second per second. The trip is one way and we cannot go back. We can not go back to an ideal time no matter when, even if such a time existed. We can move forward though. We can both build and rebuild. Which means change, the things that threaten our Civilization, the new defeating the good, works in our favour.

It is hard to get a small percentage of the population to read, but there reaches a point where it gets easier. Then near the end when nearly everyone can read it gets very hard again. That is the point that Liberalism is reaching, it feels it is close to it's endpoint. But from this point onward's the struggle gets harder, much harder. Now that cycle favours us, it's not inevitable but it is a trend, like a tide. Even restoring things to how they once were will feel like something new to most people. In fact to most people it really will be new.

While the things that they are pushing will seem like the old way of doing things. The future can be ours if we push!

Upon Hope Blog - A Traditional Conservative Future
Another Article You Might Like?
Support Richard Spencer and Yourself

Sunday, 11 November 2018

The Sixty-Eighth Month

I thought after the Melbourne Traditionalist Conference that I would get less busy and I would be writing more! Unfortunately that hasn't been true at all, so the gaps between posts has remained. All I can say is I'm sorry and I'll try and do better.

The great thing that happened this last month was of course the Melbourne Traditionalists Conference. While nothing has been confirmed all of the feedback has been positive and I am leaning towards the yes side of things. Stay tuned.

This month I have had 3,980 visitors, the best day was the 21st October when I had 291 visitors, and the worst day was the 2nd November when I had 72.

October-November
EntryPageviews
United States
1704
Australia
567
Singapore
488
France
300
Indonesia
153
Turkey
94
Ukraine
69
Philippines
67
United Kingdom
59
Germany
45

September-October
EntryPageviews
United States
1588
Australia
493
Unknown Region
368
Philippines
211
Poland
191
Ukraine
191
Indonesia
154
Germany
151
Singapore
116
United Kingdom
83

The United States, Australia and Singapore are all up, Singapore by a long way!

Indonesia is basically the same.

Ukraine, Philippines, United Kingdom and Germany are down.

France and Turkey are back in the top 10.

Poland and Unknown Region have left the top 10.


I have also had visitors from the following countries: Ireland, Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Austria, Switzerland, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Czechia, Macedonia (FYROM), Albania, Romania, Russia, U.A.E., Iraq, India, Seychelles, Bangladesh, China, South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Myanmar (Burma), Thailand, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Canada, Puerto Rico, Brazil, Ecuador and Unknown Region.

I hope to see you all again.
Mark Moncrieff  

Friday, 9 November 2018

Melbourne, Terror City

A few hours ago a Muslim man launched a terrorist attack in Melbourne, Australia. He either burnt or exploded his car and then he stabbed three people, one of whom is dead. Police finally shot and wounded him after trying to disarm him.

In Bourke Street, where the last attack took place.

Here we are again, another immigrant who loves us so much he wants to kill us. Do we need any immigration? Here is yet another example of why we do not. Why do we put up with this? Why do we let our Politicians get away with it? They don't arrive here by magic, our treasonous Politicians let them in. If this man had not been allowed in then today's murderous attack would never have happened. To which the reply comes back 'but how could we know?'. The only way to stop immigrant crime and terrorism is for there to be no immigrants.

We must always remember that 100% of immigrant crime and terrorism can be prevented!

Will today's events be called terrorism or will he simply be another person who's mentally ill?

The two are not mutually exclusive, but if he is mentally ill how exactly did he get into Australia?

The truth is that this is not simply terrorism, this is treason. If the Government was on our side then this bloke would not be here. But they never quite are are they!

No details have been released on who the victims are yet, more tragedy to look forward for.

And whats going on with Victoria police? They looked like they were dancing with him, he should have been shot straight away. When I saw the footage I laughed, it was so pathetic.

Australia is not unsafe, it was made unsafe on purpose. The Government will deny that, but if they didn't do it on purpose what outcome did they expect?

Because if they expected a different outcome that makes them incompetent.

How long will we put up with this?

Upon Hope Blog - A Traditional Conservative Future
Another Article You Might Like?
Why Same Sex Marriage Is Wrong